The prosecution case review of Yunnan Qiaojia poisonings focus on the exclusion of illegal evidence -木村kaela

The prosecution case review of Yunnan Qiaojia poisonings focus on the exclusion of illegal evidence – Sohu news December 21, 2015, the social concern of kindergarten in Qiaojia County of Yunnan province venture capital money Ren trafficking case, by the Yunnan provincial procuratorate review, proposed retrial, the Yunnan provincial high court for retrial sentenced, in fact is unclear, the grounds of insufficient evidence, that money Ren Feng innocence and the court released. The money out of the court, Ren Feng said the first sentence is: "I felt like I was’ reborn ‘!" and the court prosecutors in Yunnan province procuratorate complaints department deputy director Gao Jiefeng was "relieved" after all, "rebirth" such as chicken hatched beautiful, but the hatching process is difficult. Handle the complaint cases such as "unraveling the complex cases together is not easy! As one of the stand was unraveling, only you know." Recalling the case handling process, Gao Jie peak with three words to describe. In December 2012, the "Tianya community" titled "poisoning evidence conflict, girls were unjust imprisonment of ten years" post touted, Yunnan province procuratorate network public opinion monitoring personnel perceive which may have a case, then the network public opinion made special report submitted, in charge of the hospital leadership immediately after reading instructions: "please complaint office the investigation, to verify if this is true." "Consulting the files, we found two obvious problems, and there were several transcripts of interrogation transcripts which were clearly not signed by Qian Renfeng." With 20 years of accumulation of professional knowledge and to review the case sensitive "smell", Gao Jie also found that the peak of judicial identification with the expert report, no qualification process, no review process. These questions are not mentioned in the complaint material, and these are the key evidence of conviction and sentencing. Therefore, he wrote out the doubtful points and problems found in the examination and made a report to the leaders and the leaders in charge of the institute. In July 2013, the procuratorate of Yunnan province retrieved all the files of the case and reviewed it. Qiaojia county is located more than 300 km from Kunming’s Jinsha River Valley, Yamadaka Tani, traffic inconvenience, and one must ride for more than 10 hours, but Gao Jie led investigators repeatedly from Qiaojia County, surveying the scene, ask the case related personnel. "The most difficult is to find people, a lot of people have changed, the situation has changed." Gao Jiefeng said, a lot of people to seek the address, work unit, contact, etc., have changed, looking for a lot of trouble. Finally, in the active cooperation of Qiaojia County Procuratorate, found more than 20 cases related personnel, one by one asked and made transcripts. Unfortunately, the scene is no longer the kindergarten, but also is the unit used for many years, the environment has changed a lot, the staff also asked most of that time, things after all forget, remember ", which brought great difficulties to the case review. Gao Jiefeng, time for more than 10 years, most of the material evidence, then samples, such as poison rice, edible oil, vegetables have been destroyed, can not be inspected, it is difficult to find evidence of "wrong". Review the case never give up Yunnan provincial procuratorate Deputy Attorney General Xiao Zhuo personally reviewed the case all the money Ren Feng believes that the key evidence in the case file, the lack of legitimacy, should be in the comprehensive review.

检方立案复查云南巧家投毒案 重点排除非法证据-搜狐新闻  2015年12月21日,备受社会关注的云南省巧家县幼儿园钱仁风投毒案,经云南省检察院立案复查、建议再审,云南省高级法院作出再审宣判,以事实不清、证据不足为由,宣告钱仁风无罪,并当庭释放。走出法庭,钱仁风说的第一句话是:“我感觉我是‘重生’!”而出庭的检察员云南省检察院申诉处副处长高洁峰则感到“如释重负”,毕竟“重生”如小鸡破壳而出般美好,但孵化的过程却是艰辛的。   办理申诉案件如抽丝剥茧   “不容易!一起复杂案件的复查如抽丝剥茧,其中的甘苦只有自己知道。”回忆起办案过程,高洁峰用三个字来形容。   2012年12月,“天涯社区”上题为《投毒案证据冲突,少女被冤入狱十年》的帖子被热炒,云南省检察院网络舆情监测人员敏锐地察觉其中可能有冤情,遂将其做成网络舆情专报上报,该院分管领导看后当即批示:“请申诉处调查了解,核实情况是否属实。”   “查阅卷宗我们就发现两个明显的问题,有几份讯问笔录的签字明显不是钱仁风所签。”凭借20年复查案件积累的专业素养和敏锐“嗅觉”,高洁峰还发现司法鉴定仅有鉴定报告,没有鉴定过程、没有复核过程。这些问题申诉材料中并未提及,而这些都是定罪量刑的关键证据。于是,他把审查发现的疑点和问题写成报告,向处领导和分管院领导作了汇报。2013年7月,云南省检察院调取了该案全部卷宗立案复查。   巧家县位于距离昆明300多公里的金沙江峡谷中,山高谷深,交通不便,来回一趟就得乘车十多个小时,但高洁峰带领办案人员多次往返巧家县,勘查现场,询问案件相关人员。   “最困难的就是找人,物是人非,好多情况都变了。”高洁峰说,好多要找的人住址、工作单位、联系方式等都变了,寻找起来颇费周折。最终,在巧家县检察院的积极配合下,找到了20余名案件相关人员,一一进行询问并制作了笔录。   令人遗憾的是,案发现场已不再是幼儿园,而是被另外的单位使用多年,环境变化很大,被询问的人员也大多说“时间久了,事情经过都忘了、记不清了”,这给案件复查带来了很大的困难。高洁峰介绍,时间过了十多年,当时的大部分物证、检材,比如被投毒的大米、食用油、蔬菜等都已灭失,不可能进行复检,很难找到“一锤定音”的证据。   复查案件绝不轻言放弃   云南省检察院常务副检察长肖卓亲自审阅了钱仁风案全部卷宗,认为本案关键证据缺乏合法性,应在全面复查的基础上,把重点放在非法证据的排除上,要尽最大努力“实地调查,核实疑点”。   办案人员调整思路,将复查重点放到了原定罪证据的客观真实性、合法性和关联性上来。再次到案发现场,对原案证据中抛药品的位置、一瓶药能滴出多少滴、能否大面积投毒等情节做了侦查实验,进行重构分析验证。   根据院领导要求,申诉处委托技术鉴定部门对钱仁风笔迹以及死者是否系“毒鼠强”中毒死亡等相关技术性专门问题进行文检和法医学鉴定。   技术鉴定部门鉴定发现,有3份钱仁风的有罪供述讯问笔录和2份辨认笔录的指纹虽然为钱仁风所留,但其签名为侦查人员代签。法医专家到案发地走访调查了十余个相关单位和人员,调取了被害人侯某的病例档案,对健在的两名被害人进行了体格检查。经对现有病历资料、尸体解剖报告、毒物检验报告及现场调查所取得的资料进行分析研究和甄别,出具鉴定意见认为“原案认定侯某系‘毒鼠强’中毒死亡的依据不足”。   这样的鉴定意见让案件承办人吃了“定心丸”。“复查所获证据足以使原定罪证据的客观真实性、法律性、关联性受到全面质疑,认定钱仁风构成投放危险物质罪不具有唯一性、排他性。”高洁峰说,复查到了这一步,可以得出“全案事实不清、证据不足”的结论,本案有错误的可能。   为慎重起见,经该院检察长批准,申诉处将案件提交到院检委会进行讨论,最终检委会认可了案件承办部门的意见。肖卓带领该院申诉处案件承办人到最高检申诉厅进行了汇报,申诉厅肯定复查结果,提出补查要求,并建议由该院向云南省高级法院发再审检察建议,如法院不采纳,则提起抗诉。   出庭要做到胸有成竹   2014年5月,云南省检察院以“事实不清,证据不足,原判可能存在错误”为由,向云南省高级法院发出再审检察建议书,最终法院采纳了建议,决定再审。   “我们必须做到胸有成竹,才能走上法庭。”高洁峰说,由于该案一直备受网络舆论关注,为防止出现意外引发炒作,出庭工作他们格外重视,不仅认真细致地拟订了示证质证方案、出庭意见、讯问提纲、举证和答辩提纲,还对案件庭审可能出现的问题做了预测和精心准备。同时,还请本院公诉部门负责人和全国优秀公诉人从出庭的角度,对举证提纲和答辩提纲进行了论证,提出意见建议。   2015年9月29日,在时隔13年后,云南省高级法院开庭再审钱仁风投毒案,云南省检察院检察员高洁峰、张玲出庭履职。   庭审中,检察人员将证据分为两大部分、六组、29项进行举证、示证、质证,客观真实地体现了补充调查的新证据与原审在卷证据之间的矛盾,证实了原审所采信证据中存在的疑点,从而完全打破了原审采信的证据锁链。   高洁峰发表出庭意见说,原判决认定钱仁风构成犯罪的证据不确实、不充分,且因为案件已时过境迁无法再进行补证,不能排除本案系意外事件或其他物质致中毒的可能,更不能得出系钱仁风投放危险物质导致被害人死亡的唯一结论。因此,建议依法撤销原判,改判钱仁风无罪。   链接   云南省检察机关刑事申诉检察部门围绕“强化法律监督,维护公平正义”检察工作主题,不断加大不服法院生效刑事裁判申诉案件办理力度,形成了立体监督、多元监督、有效监督的法律监督格局。2015年,共受理不服检察机关处理决定申诉案件224件,审查结案32件,立案复查150件(开展公开审查18件),复查结案137件,息诉128件,改变检察机关原处理决定16件;共受理不服法院生效刑事裁判申诉案件592件,已审查结案255件,立案复查243件,复查结案227件,复查后提出抗诉3件,提出再审检察建议8件,法院再审改判9件;共受理国家赔偿申请27件,决定给予赔偿14件,支付赔偿金54.89万元;共受理司法救助申请880人,核拨救助851人,发放救助金813.11万元。相关的主题文章: